List of Selected Contributions about
the Medical Aspects of the Corona Pandemic

“If materialism were to triumph at the expense of (spiritual) tradition,
chemical remedies alone could not effect any healing.
Materialistic medicine will have no basis in the future.
This seems at present like a mere fantasy,
but it is actually something that will soon come about.”

Rudolf Steiner

on the origins of epidemics

AN ALTERNATIVE VIEW OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES

In this video interview Dr Quanten presents an alternative view of the origin of infectious diseases. First he explains that all the microorganisms found in the case of infectious diseases are there because of the diseased tissue, not the other way around as is the official medical narrative. When the tissue deteriorates it provides food for microorganisms which come from inside. After these microorganisms clean the body of debris they die. And in regard to viruses his explanation is that they are nothing more than a tiny little waste bag of genetic material inside the cell. This means that the cell and its DNA structure is starting to disintegrate because it is ill. The cell is unhealthy and these viruses are the first sign of cellular structure breaking down.

A DIFFERENT VIEW ON THE NATURE OF COVID-19

In this video presentation Andrew Kaufman who is an expert in several medical fields presents evidence regarding the lack of gold standard in the case of tests searching for a specific virus that presumably is causing Covid-19 disease. Then he shows the remarkable similarity of viruses with exosomes which are produced by cells as their response to toxic substances, stress, radiation and some other influences. His conclusion is that a respiratory illness is caused by an insult, toxic or otherwise, which consequently lead to the production of exosomes (viruses).

A FORGOTTEN VIEW OF THE POSITIVE SIDE OF INFECTIONS

A short article that in the present atmosphere of compulsive over-disinfection of hands, people and places might sound rather unusual. But if we consider that our immune system needs to grow strong from childhood onwards through being exposed to various impacts – and that a sterilised environment doesn’t provide enough opportunities for this – we can see the sense in needing as many infections as we can safely deal with to keep our individualised microbiome and related immune system in healthy balance with our environment. Hence the author concludes that the social distancing regulations are in fact counterproductive.

AN INDEPENDENT SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION OF THE FAKE EPIDEMICS

If one follows public pronouncements the world is repeatedly afflicted with new terrible virus diseases. As the latest horror variant, the so-called coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 dominated the headlines. The population is also terrified by reports of measles, swine flu, SARS, BSE, AIDS or polio. However, this virus mayhem ignores very basic scientific facts: the existence, the pathogenicity and the deadly effects of these agents have never been proven. The medical establishment and its loyal media acolytes claim that this evidence has been produced. But these claims are highly suspect because modern medicine has pushed direct virus proof methods aside and uses dubious indirect tools to ‘prove’ the existence of viruses such as antibody tests and the PCR test.

See also Review of the book Virus Mania

ALL MODERN VIROLOGY IS BASED ON FALSE EXPERIMENTS

Contrary to what most people believe, there is no scientific evidence that viruses are the cause of any infectious disease in the case of human beings. All scientists who think they are working with viruses in laboratories are actually working with typical particles of specific dying tissues or cells which were prepared in a special way. They believe that those tissues and cells are dying because they were infected by a virus. In reality, those prepared tissues and cells are dying because they were starved and poisoned as a consequence of the experiments in the laboratory. This was proven in the German Federal Supreme Court at the end of the measles virus trial (2012-2017).

A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE COVID-19 CRISIS

The Canadian author of this 32-page long article demonstrates that anthroposophists can very constructively contribute to the current global political, economic and medical upheavals of the present times by their determination to seek the truth in the broadest sense, shying away from no question, submitting ourselves to no prejudice and remaining open to answers which may challenge their usual habits of thought. This is done by means of critical evaluation of scientific evidence that refutes the seven basic claims of the dominant medical/scientific/bureaucratic doctrine regarding Covid-19. These are: people are dying around the world from a new infectious disease; scientists have isolated a new coronavirus; scientists have proven that SARS-CoV-2 causes the disease; accurate and reliable tests have been developed for detecting the presence of this virus; safe and effective vaccines reduce the probability of contracting or spreading the disease; measures of the wearing of masks, social distancing and lockdowns have been politically imposed for the public good; the social good achieved through these measures to contain the disease outweigh the harm done by the measures.

About Virus Isolation and PCR Test

TWO EXAMPLES OF SCIENTIFIC FRAUD EXPOSED

Here is a short description of the difference between real and fake virus isolation that is a crucial piece of information that can help you to understand the ongoing controversy over whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus has ever been isolated/purified or not. As is explained both procedures used by modern virologists to prove the existence of a specific virus and its pathogenicity are examples of a scientific fraud.

FAKE VIRUS ‘ISOLATION’ VERSUS TRUE VIRUS ISOLATION

For the sake of producing an epidemic even the meanings of words in scientific protocols are misinterpreted and misused. One example is when microbiologists and virologists, taking a swab sample which contain viruses, consider this as an act of ‘virus isolation’ from the human host. But inside the swabs are soups, mixtures of many things, never viruses alone, nor the same types and strains of viruses. True virus isolation would demand to separate specific viruses from the rest of the content in the swabs – including from other viruses – and then to characterise their DNA/RNA sequences and protein structures.

COVID-19 PCR TESTS ARE SCIENTIFICALLY MEANINGLESS

Among a few problems with the use of PRC tests to prove that person has virus SARS-CoV-2 is the fact that PCR is extremely sensitive. That means that it can detect even the smallest pieces of DNA or RNA – but it cannot determine where these particles came from. That has to be determined beforehand. And because the PCR tests are calibrated for gene sequences, we have to know that these gene snippets are part of the looked-for virus and not part of other viruses or the dead viral debris. And to know that, correct isolation and purification of the presumed virus has to be executed. As this has so far not been done by any research department, the authors conclude that the PCR test to ‘diagnose’ SARS-CoV-2 infection are simply not fit for purpose.

SOCIETY IS LOCKED DOWN BY OVER-SENSITIVE PCR TEST

The author exposes a very interesting reversal of the most common practice of doctors to  compare the test results with the patient’s clinical condition (symptoms and signs), which takes precedence over everything else when it comes to their decisions for treatments. But now governments and affiliated medical experts are allowing the highly unreliable PCR test to ‘decide’ if people are ill or not. What is the most deleterious and misleading in regard to these PCR tests is their over-sensitivity, resulting in false positive tests. And if you still wonder how this PCR test operates you can get a better grasp of it by means of very helpful graphical illustration.

PCR TESTS DETECT FRAGMENTS OF MICROBES AND HUMAN RNA

This article presents scientific evidence that not one of the seven supposed human coronaviruses has really been isolated. The differences between them are the outcome of different laboratory procedures and techniques that are becoming progressively more sophisticated. This creates a greater opportunity for deception and self-deception that has culminated in the virtual manufacture of the SARS-CoV-2. And when performing the search in two databases – a collection of microbe genomes and a collection of the human genome – it was found out that the genetic sequences used in PCR tests to detect suspected SARS-CoV-2 are present in dozens of sequences of the human genome itself and in those of about a hundred microbes. For these reasons the PCR tests are worthless and all ‘positive’ results obtained so far should be scientifically invalidated.

THE SARS-COV-2 VIRAL GENOME IS A COMPUTER GENERATED CONSTRUCT

The procedure that has ‘proved’ the existence of the novel corona virus is the following: Researchers take the impure samples and they look for specific sequences that they’ve pre-identified as being viral in nature. These sequences are taken from the already existing database of viruses. After finding all these little pieces of genetic sequences which we don’t know where they originated from and if they are related, they sew all these sequences together and say that this is the genome sequence of this virus. Therefore the SARS-CoV-2 viral genome is a stitched-together construct made up of all sorts of different genetic sequences, including human DNA sequences. Besides, this is not a real virus found in any living organism, but an abstract digitally created database virus.

WE ARE DEALING WITH THE PHANTOM VIRUS

This article provides evidence that the health authorities cannot present decisive proof that a new virus named SARS-CoV-2 is haunting us. As it is an almost impossible mission to separate extracellular vesicles and exosomes (which are produced by our own body) from viruses by means of existing isolation methods, the ‘virus genome’ is nothing but a computer model. This alone turns the talk of dangerous viral mutations into irresponsible fearmongering and the so-called SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests definitely into a worthless, but very expensive, venture.  Besides, there is no conclusive scientific proof that SARS-CoV-2 can fly through air or be transmitted via droplets, nor about the existence of asymptomatic ‘infection’.