List of Selected Contributions about
the Medical Aspects of the Corona Pandemic

“If materialism were to triumph at the expense of (spiritual) tradition,
chemical remedies alone could not effect any healing.
Materialistic medicine will have no basis in the future.
This seems at present like a mere fantasy,
but it is actually something that will soon come about.”

Rudolf Steiner


on the origins of epidemics


In this video interview Dr Quanten presents an alternative view of the origin of infectious diseases. First he explains that all the microorganisms found in the case of infectious diseases are there because of the diseased tissue, not the other way around as is the official medical narrative. When the tissue deteriorates it provides food for microorganisms which come from inside. After these microorganisms clean the body of debris they die. And in regard to viruses his explanation is that they are nothing more than a tiny little waste bag of genetic material inside the cell. This means that the cell and its DNA structure is starting to disintegrate because it is ill. The cell is unhealthy and these viruses are the first sign of cellular structure breaking down.

the most important point is to ask the right questions

TERRAIN exposes the tyrannical world pandemic hoax, built upon the flawed model of illness and disease known as Germ Theory. This two-part documentary explores Terrain Theory, a model for health that works in symbiosis with nature to promote wellness and healing, free of a corrupt and flawed medical paradigm. TERRAIN motivates and inspires viewers to understand the power and responsibility of consent.

An ancient rivalry between germ and terrain theory

In the view of the germ theory of French chemist Louis Pasteur, the only defence against disease is the targeted use of pharmaceuticals designed to attack, disable and kill the specific microorganism by means of aggressive vaccination, the sterilization of one’s environment, and physical avoidance of pathogens. In contrast to this, terrain theory – based on the research of French physician Antoine Béchamp – opens the door into the fascinating world of dust-like particles, ‘microzymas’ and their ability to metamorphose when they are exposed to various forms of stress that are upsetting the homeostatic balance of human organism. They can under certain conditions, even transform into bacteria.


Contrary to what most people believe, there is no scientific evidence that viruses are the cause of any infectious disease in the case of human beings. All scientists who think they are working with viruses in laboratories are actually working with typical particles of specific dying tissues or cells which were prepared in a special way. They believe that those tissues and cells are dying because they were infected by a virus. In reality, those prepared tissues and cells are dying because they were starved and poisoned as a consequence of the experiments in the laboratory. This was proven in the German Federal Supreme Court at the end of the measles virus trial (2012-2017).


In this paper the author explains how the ‘bacteriophages’ – correctly defined as incomplete mini spores and building blocks of the bacteria – have been scientifically isolated, while the so-called pathogenic viruses have never been observed in humans or animals or in their body fluids and have never been isolated and subsequently biochemically analyzed. To date, none of the researchers involved in virology research seem to have realized this very important point – or they are not allowed to do so by their superiors!? For the outcome of the revelation that the experiments are performed in such a manner that it is very easy to misinterpreted cellular particles as viruses, would be disastrous for the multi billion industry of epidemics due to ‘contagious viruses’.


If one follows public pronouncements the world is repeatedly afflicted with new terrible virus diseases. As the latest horror variant, the so-called coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 dominated the headlines. The population is also terrified by reports of measles, swine flu, SARS, BSE, AIDS or polio. However, this virus mayhem ignores very basic scientific facts: the existence, the pathogenicity and the deadly effects of these agents have never been proven. The medical establishment and its loyal media acolytes claim that this evidence has been produced. But these claims are highly suspect because modern medicine has pushed direct virus proof methods aside and uses dubious indirect tools to ‘prove’ the existence of viruses such as antibody tests and the PCR test.

❖ See also Review of the book Virus Mania


The doctors, scientists and journalists featured in this five-part, seven hour documentary series, examine in detail the scientific papers that were used to justify the corona pandemic, and what they find is shattering. They explore every single major claim, from the ‘isolation’ of the virus to its so-called genetic sequencing, from the discovery of how to ‘test’ for SARS-CoV2 to the emergence of ‘variants’ that in reality exist only on a computer. Their point is that the so-called SARS-CoV-2 virus exists only as a mental construct whose existence in the real world has been disproven by the science itself. They expose the growing cult of virology, built on pseudo-science, revealing the extraordinary leaps of fantasy buried in their methodology, the contradictions quietly acknowledged in their papers, their desperate effort to change language to justify their findings and the obvious incongruence of their conclusions.

About Virus Isolation and PCR Test


This short statement describes the proper way to isolate, characterize and demonstrate a new virus, and to prove its pathogenicity that has been used by virologists in the past. But since 1954, virologists have been using the method that can be characterised as a scientific fraud. For they take unpurified samples from a relatively few people and this brew is then subjected to genetic analysis, which then creates in a computer-simulation process the alleged sequence of the alleged virus, a so called in silico genome. Another systemic scientific fraud is when the unpurified specimen is inoculated onto tissue culture along with toxic antibiotics and other tissues and the consequent destruction of the cells is given as evidence of the virus’ existence and its pathogenicity.


For the sake of producing an epidemic even the meanings of words in scientific protocols are misinterpreted and misused. One example is when microbiologists and virologists, taking a swab sample which contain viruses, consider this as an act of ‘virus isolation’ from the human host. But inside the swabs are soups, mixtures of many things, never viruses alone, nor the same types and strains of viruses. True virus isolation would demand to separate specific viruses from the rest of the content in the swabs – including from other viruses – and then to characterise their DNA/RNA sequences and protein structures.


Among a few problems with the use of PCR tests to prove that person has virus SARS-CoV-2 is the fact that PCR is extremely sensitive. That means that it can detect even the smallest pieces of DNA or RNA – but it cannot determine where these particles came from. That has to be determined beforehand. And because the PCR tests are calibrated for gene sequences, we have to know that these gene snippets are part of the looked-for virus and not part of other viruses or the dead viral debris. And to know that, correct isolation and purification of the presumed virus has to be executed. As this has so far not been done by any research department, the authors conclude that the PCR test to ‘diagnose’ SARS-CoV-2 infection are simply not fit for purpose.


The author exposes a very interesting reversal of the most common practice of doctors to compare the test results with the patient’s clinical condition (symptoms and signs), which takes precedence over everything else when it comes to their decisions for diagnosis and treatment. But now governments and affiliated medical experts are allowing the highly unreliable PCR test to ‘decide’ if people are ill or not. What is the most deleterious and misleading in regard to these PCR tests is their over-sensitivity, resulting in false positive tests. And if you still wonder how this PCR test operates you can get a better grasp of it by means of very helpful graphical illustration.


This article presents scientific evidence that not one of the seven supposed human coronaviruses has really been isolated. The differences between them are the outcome of different laboratory procedures and techniques that are becoming progressively more sophisticated. This creates a greater opportunity for deception and self-deception that has culminated in the virtual manufacture of the SARS-CoV-2. And when performing the search in two databases – a collection of microbe genomes and a collection of the human genome – it was found out that the genetic sequences used in PCR tests to detect suspected SARS-CoV-2 are present in dozens of sequences of the human genome itself and in those of about a hundred microbes. For these reasons the PCR tests are worthless and all ‘positive’ results obtained so far should be scientifically invalidated.


The procedure that has ‘proved’ the existence of the novel corona virus is the following: Researchers take the impure samples and they look for specific sequences that they’ve pre-identified as being viral in nature. These sequences are taken from the already existing database of viruses. After finding all these little pieces of genetic sequences which we don’t know where they originated from and if they are related, they sew all these sequences together and say that this is the genome sequence of this virus. Therefore the SARS-CoV-2 viral genome is a stitched-together construct made up of all sorts of different genetic sequences, including human DNA sequences. Besides, this is not a real virus found in any living organism, but an abstract digitally created database virus.


This article provides evidence that the health authorities cannot present decisive proof that a new virus named SARS-CoV-2 is haunting us. As it is an almost impossible mission to separate extracellular vesicles and exosomes (which are produced by our own body) from viruses by means of existing isolation methods, the ‘virus genome’ is nothing but a computer model. This alone turns the talk of dangerous viral mutations into irresponsible fearmongering and the so-called SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests definitely into a worthless, but very expensive, venture. Besides, there is no conclusive scientific proof that SARS-CoV-2 can fly through air or be transmitted via droplets, nor about the existence of asymptomatic ‘infection’.